Building closer to an LPG tank or filling station than the required separation distance? We calculate the actual hazard ranges and design alternative solutions for fire service approval (in Poland: the Regional Fire Service Headquarters, KW PSP).
Regulations set minimum separation distances between LPG tanks or filling stations and buildings. On built-up plots they often cannot be met. The development then stands or falls on a calculation of what would actually reach the façade in an accident.
A retail and service building in Płońsk, Poland, was designed next to an existing filling station with two above-ground LPG tanks of 4,850 l each. Polish regulations prescribe a 60 m separation distance in this case; the plot allowed 33.4 m.
The calculations showed a thermal radiation of 8.79 kW/m² and an overpressure of 3.21 kPa on the façade nearest the station. Both structural damage thresholds end short of the building. The remaining exposure was addressed by three alternative solutions: an A2-class façade on the station side, P4A safety glazing in the shop windows and escape exits on the façades facing away from the tanks.
Jet fire thermal radiation ≥ 12.5 kW/m²
Vapour cloud explosion overpressure ≥ 5 kPa
Distance from the tank in metres. Solid line: façade of the proposed building. Dashed line: prescriptive separation distance under Polish regulations.
Every accident scenario ends with a number at a point on the façade of the protected building. The approving authority sees not a general risk, but a specific load on a specific wall.
Tank type and capacity from the nameplate, fittings, distances from the survey map and site plan.
Event tree with frequencies based on HSE and CNBOP-PIB data for LPG stations.
Full calculation chains for each scenario, which the approving authority can check step by step.
Results compared with the thresholds of the Polish State Fire Service HQ (KG PSP) methodology, with scenarios classified in a risk matrix.
Selection of alternative solutions, a report by a certified fire safety expert (rzeczoznawca) and the application to the Regional Fire Service Headquarters (KW PSP).
We usually combine the analysis with a fire engineering expertise report, and for larger installations with an assessment under the major accident hazard methodology.
Each measure follows from a specific exceedance in the calculations. We do not add protection just in case, because every measure costs the developer money.
FAQ
Yes, as an alternative solution. The hazard analysis shows what actually reaches the building at the real distance, and the fire safety expert's report specifies measures that give a level of safety no lower than the prescriptive requirement. On that basis the Regional Fire Service Commander in Poland can approve the solution.
The analysis is the calculation part: accident scenarios, thermal radiation and overpressure ranges, acceptability assessment. The expertise report is the formal document that identifies the deviation from the regulations and the alternative solutions. When a building is placed closer to a tank, we usually prepare both documents together.
A site plan with distances, the tank type (above or below ground) and its capacity, ideally a photo of the nameplate, plans and elevations of the building on the tank side, and the building use. We carry out the site visit ourselves.
Yes, we always assess this scenario. For certified stationary tanks up to 10 m³ we justify it as negligible using event frequency data. For larger tanks we calculate the fireball consequences.
The cost depends on the number of tanks, the number of protected buildings and whether an expertise report with an application to the Regional Fire Service Commander is also needed. We quote individually once we have the site plan.
Send us the site plan. We will tell you whether the distance can be justified by calculation and which alternative solutions it will require.